As a culture vulture (devotee of art), I trust in soft diplomacy more than hard diplomacy. I believe that, more can be done through peaceful means in solving a problem or addressing an issue that threatens to bring war or conflict between different interest groups in a country or region. Base on that, I consider any form of international diplomacy (UN mediation, negotiation, peacekeeping team) that warrants the use of ‘extreme coercive measures’ like using arms to over-throw a government in order to install another leader as a failed diplomatic mission. Such measures often claim innocent lives, destroy properties and contribute to taking away the peace of people in the society, all in the name of collateral damages. It is on this note that UN, AU, ECOWAS should be commended for averting a sheer civil war in Ivory Coast. Although, from December 2010 to April 2011 that Gbagbo’s leadership was finally incapacitated, lives were lost, properties were destroyed and peace went into comma; however, the magnitude of damage can not be compared to what Ivoirians could have experienced if the issue resulted in a complete civil war.
Within this period of unpredictability, UN forces in Ivory Coast protected President Quatara in the ‘Hotel of Refuge’ (The Golf Hotel) till his time of glory finally comes. In this way, it was difficult for government soldiers loyal to Gbagbo to access the hotel and cause harm to him (President Quatara). Also, the series of meetings organized by these bodies did not seek out-right measures of pushing Gbagbo out of power even though he was an expired president who just wanted to cause confusion unjustifiably. Instead, the change of signatory to West African Development Bank, cutting trade relations and continuous visits to Gbagbo by other African leaders, making him to see reasons and handover power were diplomatic measures that were meant to exhaust his pride and ego and eventually deflate his pomposity in favour peace.
The expiration of Gbagbo’s claim to presidency, which was militarily influenced by French soldiers, in this case, can not be said to be glorious no matter what. This is because, the set-back that Gbagbo has brought to Ivory Coast’s economy, the lives lost, the properties destroyed, the post psychological trauma that people are still experiencing are far greater than the mere Gbagbo’s exit. Rather, UN, AU, and ECOWAS should be commended for their steadfastness to ensure that peace return Ivory Coast within a short time.
At this point, one can proudly say that African politics is currently under-going changes that will eventually make the continent an endearing place to live, work or visit by foreigners without second thought. The role of United Nations (UN) is to continue to support this change for transformation to take place.
From monarchical rule, Africa finds itself in the hands of colonial rule. After colonialism was displaced, military rule exercised its dominance in most parts of the continent. The coming of democracy brought another challenge. Most leaders who got power through democratic means were not ready to welcome a new democratic government. In this way, they prefer to violently oppose any political group that criticized their policies and instead stay in power for as long as its takes. This phenomenon led Africa into a stage of “power sharing”. In this way, if a leader refuses to let go, power should be shared between the ruling party (the serving president) and the opposition party in order to foster peace among the groups. The common ground for establishing a power sharing government was to let peace rain. With the successful deposal of Gbagbo by French soldiers (even though they claim otherwise) with the support of UN, AU and ECOWAS in Ivory Coast, it can be assumed that the era of power sharing has also come to an end. Coupled with the political development in North Africa, it is clear that, Africa is going through politically refined process that after it is complete, it shall never be the same again.
All that United Nations (UN) needs to do in this process is to offer continuous support to other African nations who desire and are working toward a positive change to better the lives of their populace. On the whole, the role of UN in Ivory Coast is commendable. At least, other African leaders thinking of power sharing deal after losing elections will take note.
Art in Disguise is a blogspot that seeks to define the meaning/role of art in relevant social issues of critical concern to the progress of mankind.
*** Art in Disguise ***
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Thursday, April 14, 2011
The Art of Recycling Waste
One of the biggest problems of developing countries especially in Africa is how to manage all kinds of waste products which have posed a threat/harm to the lives of people in the society. Take Nigeria for example, there are many streams and rivers in the Niger delta region that have seriously been damaged by the constant release of liquid waste from activities of oil companies. On the other hand, it is common to walk in major Nigerian cities like Lagos, Kaduna, Ibadan, Aba, etc and find heaps of refuse dumps which composed of solid waste as well as discarded materials like used-polythene bags, empty cans, e-waste products (like used recharged cards), vehicle/engine parts, and so on. The gathering point of some of these solid waste can be anywhere irrespective of whether it is near a major market, or close to a residential area.
Recently, new forms of artistic expression, most especially in sculpture have emerged and many artists have resorted to using discarded materials and recycling them, artistically, into beautiful art works. This form of art, essentially, focuses on the conversion of discarded materials into a more environmental friendly products that can be used either at homes or in public places. European artists like Subodh Gupta (“Very Hungry God”, 2006) and Michel Tuffery (“Pisupo Lau Afe”, 2000) are among individuals who have produced works in this direction. In Africa, the works of El Anatsui is a good example of this form of art. Anatsui’s “Peak Project” consists of used milk can-lids of about 3-foot high forming an anthills’ composition. The work also reflected, symbolically, a pattern of consumption which often generates trashes that are common in developing countries. It is against this background that the works of Anthony S. Ekpe, a young and vibrant contemporary Nigerian artist, genuinely caught my attention.
The works of Anthony are not only aesthetically pleasing but also environmentally meaningful (friendly). The artist usually move about collecting everyday waste materials like empty beverage containers from households, or visit waste bins and garbage heaps. After gathering a sizable number (quantity) of such materials required to start and finish a work, he will make sketches of the art forms he intends to create. According to the artist, “the conceptual formation of ideas for the art forms preceded sketches from model diagrams, photographs, and work actualization. The images sought for could be animals, human figures, mask or natural forms”. This is latter proceeded by taking mould of the image to be constructed after which the artist starts beating, compressing and doing repousse as well as joining (welding) the partitions of the entire work into an ideal shape.
Given this medium of exploration, Anthony employed stylization and abstraction as basic styles in rendering various sculptural forms of artistic standard. The “Trumpeter”(2009), for instance, the artist used iron rods and constructed anatomical frame on which the red compressed cans were selectively welded to cover parts of the work to achieve the shape/form of a person blowing trumpet. In this way, other parts of work are neatly covered while others are deliberately left, exposing the frame in a stylized manner.
The work is significant in two ways. First, the waste (discarded) materials used by Anthony in making the work qualify it (the “Trumpeter”) an environmental friendly art piece. This has contributed (no matter how little) positively in addressing part of the environmental issues which Nigeria is facing currently. Secondly, the image captured by the artist has cultural connotation to the lives of people in northern Nigeria which is the immediate practicing environment of the artist. Hence, it can said that the artist made use of trash (waste materials) in projecting the culture of the people in Northern Nigeria; a view which might sound controversial but realistically unassuming. Base on these significance, it is therefore, safe to conclude that, the “Trumpeter” is a work that is not only environmental friendly, but also cultural friendly since it portrays an image that is commonly associated with the popular culture of the people.
Recently, new forms of artistic expression, most especially in sculpture have emerged and many artists have resorted to using discarded materials and recycling them, artistically, into beautiful art works. This form of art, essentially, focuses on the conversion of discarded materials into a more environmental friendly products that can be used either at homes or in public places. European artists like Subodh Gupta (“Very Hungry God”, 2006) and Michel Tuffery (“Pisupo Lau Afe”, 2000) are among individuals who have produced works in this direction. In Africa, the works of El Anatsui is a good example of this form of art. Anatsui’s “Peak Project” consists of used milk can-lids of about 3-foot high forming an anthills’ composition. The work also reflected, symbolically, a pattern of consumption which often generates trashes that are common in developing countries. It is against this background that the works of Anthony S. Ekpe, a young and vibrant contemporary Nigerian artist, genuinely caught my attention.
The works of Anthony are not only aesthetically pleasing but also environmentally meaningful (friendly). The artist usually move about collecting everyday waste materials like empty beverage containers from households, or visit waste bins and garbage heaps. After gathering a sizable number (quantity) of such materials required to start and finish a work, he will make sketches of the art forms he intends to create. According to the artist, “the conceptual formation of ideas for the art forms preceded sketches from model diagrams, photographs, and work actualization. The images sought for could be animals, human figures, mask or natural forms”. This is latter proceeded by taking mould of the image to be constructed after which the artist starts beating, compressing and doing repousse as well as joining (welding) the partitions of the entire work into an ideal shape.
Given this medium of exploration, Anthony employed stylization and abstraction as basic styles in rendering various sculptural forms of artistic standard. The “Trumpeter”(2009), for instance, the artist used iron rods and constructed anatomical frame on which the red compressed cans were selectively welded to cover parts of the work to achieve the shape/form of a person blowing trumpet. In this way, other parts of work are neatly covered while others are deliberately left, exposing the frame in a stylized manner.
The work is significant in two ways. First, the waste (discarded) materials used by Anthony in making the work qualify it (the “Trumpeter”) an environmental friendly art piece. This has contributed (no matter how little) positively in addressing part of the environmental issues which Nigeria is facing currently. Secondly, the image captured by the artist has cultural connotation to the lives of people in northern Nigeria which is the immediate practicing environment of the artist. Hence, it can said that the artist made use of trash (waste materials) in projecting the culture of the people in Northern Nigeria; a view which might sound controversial but realistically unassuming. Base on these significance, it is therefore, safe to conclude that, the “Trumpeter” is a work that is not only environmental friendly, but also cultural friendly since it portrays an image that is commonly associated with the popular culture of the people.
Saturday, April 9, 2011
Africa, a Masquerade from Heaven
In an art historical field work, there is always a tendency for one to experience a strong or powerful work of art that will, unconsciously, threatens to redirect the purpose of his/her research on a given topic. This was the exact way I felt after experiencing “Masquerade from Heaven (2009)”, an installation work done by Gerald Chukwuma and exhibited in Goethe Institut, Lagos, in December, 2009. Before that time, I have come across a number of phrases describing Africa as “a God forsaken land”, “a black continent” and so on. My contention on most of these phrases hinged on the fact that, none gives a desired picture of the continent and her people. For example, calling Africa “a black continent” means that people in the Maghreb states are visitors and the sub-saharan states with black population are the real owners of Africa. Although the continent is obviously the root of the black race, calling it “a black continent” does not give a true representation of what Africa is.
Also, if Africa is labeled as “a God forsaken land” probably because of the disasters (wars, diseases, HIV and other forms of crisis) taking place on the continent, that is still not a suitable way of describing Africa. This is because other continents also do experience a fair share of some of these disasters mentioned above, either in natural (as in the case of Japan’s earthquake) or un-natural way (like the civil disturbance/wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestinian etc). Base on these, it will be out of point to say that Africa is the only God forsaken continent in the world. It is in line with such views that “Masquerade from Heaven” find its relevance especially in redefining Africa amidst the controversial views differently held by others about the continent.
The work is an installation art that represents the relationship between Africa and the outside world. The artist make use of compressed empty cans, used recharge cards, pieces of wood, and other light-weight waste materials of varying shapes and sizes, and knitted them together using copper wire. This resulted into a wide multi-colour surface that was neatly tied around a constructed frame of about 6 feet high. The different colours of the materials used were aesthetically pleasing such that, if viewed from a distance, look more like an interesting mosaic. The design of the installation kept viewers wondering what could be inside the chamber of this motionless masquerade. This is probably the same way Africa is being treated. While many people approached it from the outside, no body knows the true situation of things as actually happening in Africa.
On the whole, the artist considers Africa as a masquerade with evils features like wars, sickness, poverty, corruption; yet the West and so called “first and second” world countries have profound interest in her rich and valuable resources. The work, in a way, revealed something about the negative image of Africa which countries like Nigeria have engaged in active campaign (Rebrand Nigeria- Good people, great nation) to help change the negative beliefs/thoughts stereotypically held against the African continent or people of African origin by the outside world.
Also, if Africa is labeled as “a God forsaken land” probably because of the disasters (wars, diseases, HIV and other forms of crisis) taking place on the continent, that is still not a suitable way of describing Africa. This is because other continents also do experience a fair share of some of these disasters mentioned above, either in natural (as in the case of Japan’s earthquake) or un-natural way (like the civil disturbance/wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestinian etc). Base on these, it will be out of point to say that Africa is the only God forsaken continent in the world. It is in line with such views that “Masquerade from Heaven” find its relevance especially in redefining Africa amidst the controversial views differently held by others about the continent.
The work is an installation art that represents the relationship between Africa and the outside world. The artist make use of compressed empty cans, used recharge cards, pieces of wood, and other light-weight waste materials of varying shapes and sizes, and knitted them together using copper wire. This resulted into a wide multi-colour surface that was neatly tied around a constructed frame of about 6 feet high. The different colours of the materials used were aesthetically pleasing such that, if viewed from a distance, look more like an interesting mosaic. The design of the installation kept viewers wondering what could be inside the chamber of this motionless masquerade. This is probably the same way Africa is being treated. While many people approached it from the outside, no body knows the true situation of things as actually happening in Africa.
On the whole, the artist considers Africa as a masquerade with evils features like wars, sickness, poverty, corruption; yet the West and so called “first and second” world countries have profound interest in her rich and valuable resources. The work, in a way, revealed something about the negative image of Africa which countries like Nigeria have engaged in active campaign (Rebrand Nigeria- Good people, great nation) to help change the negative beliefs/thoughts stereotypically held against the African continent or people of African origin by the outside world.
Sunday, April 3, 2011
The Postponement of National Assembly’s Election and its Implications on April 2011 Election
It was hardly 7:30 am when I started seeing people troop in a nearby government school close to where I reside in Sabo, one of the heavily populated areas in Kaduna city. By the time I joined them a few minutes passed eight o’clock, the whole corridors of the school blocks were occupied mostly by relatively aged men and women, while the teeming youths were scattered around, waiting for INEC officials to surface. At around 12:00 pm, hunger, tiredness and the effect of the scorching sun was already telling on the faces of everyone in the polling station. Yet, everyone seems to be determined to wait till they cast their vote.
One good thing about the waiting voters was the confidence they seem to have that the current INEC/election will be different from the past ones. Majority of the people were capitalizing on Jega’s (the INEC boss) statement of “One Man, One Vote” to presume the fairness of the election. However, the expectations of the people could not be met as news latter filtered in the waiting crowd (around 1:00pm) that the election has been postponed to Monday April 4, 2011. This was followed by signs of dissatisfaction with the system as almost everybody who speaks was not happy about the situation. After Nigerians began making arrangement against Monday, another news arrived that, the Monday election has been cancel and taken to Saturday which supposed to be a date scheduled for governorship elections. The question now is that, what implication would this have on the general 2011 elections?
It is important to know that, Nigerians have shown great commitment to participate in this year’s election, but based on the past experiences, Nigerians are beginning to loss hope in the credibility of Jega’s INEC regime. While some people look at the current situation as a deliberate way to confused Nigerians and allow manipulation to set in, others expressed faith in the Jega led INEC regime. From the time being, it appears the postponement will definitely affect turn-up of voters on Monday.
Another thing is that, in Kaduna North Local Government Area, the final list that include the names of all NYSC (Corps) members as well as INEC ad-hoc staff who were to participate in the election could not be placed until around 7:30pm on Friday. In this way, it was difficult for those involved to travel to various destinations (polling units) on time as many did not even know the exact locations of the polling stations they were assigned to go to. This was also viewed as a deliberate hitch to frustrate the smoothness of the election. Where the issue gets complicated is that, despite all these elections were held in some places that voters’ materials arrived in good time. For example, voting took place in some polling stations in Kagoro in Kaura Local Government Area of Kaduna state. The question now is, would INEC allow the results of such elections to be valid or the people have to recast their vote for the second time?
In whichever way one chooses to view this issue, two things are involved. First, it appears that the billions of naira invested in INEC for the purpose of these 2011 elections is showing no significant positive result. Secondly, if Nigeria has billions of naira to invest in elections that will come and go, instead of fixing the roads to reduce accidents, then the government should be prepared to compensate citizens for the inconveniences caused by INEC in such unwholesome postponement of subsequent elections.
One good thing about the waiting voters was the confidence they seem to have that the current INEC/election will be different from the past ones. Majority of the people were capitalizing on Jega’s (the INEC boss) statement of “One Man, One Vote” to presume the fairness of the election. However, the expectations of the people could not be met as news latter filtered in the waiting crowd (around 1:00pm) that the election has been postponed to Monday April 4, 2011. This was followed by signs of dissatisfaction with the system as almost everybody who speaks was not happy about the situation. After Nigerians began making arrangement against Monday, another news arrived that, the Monday election has been cancel and taken to Saturday which supposed to be a date scheduled for governorship elections. The question now is that, what implication would this have on the general 2011 elections?
It is important to know that, Nigerians have shown great commitment to participate in this year’s election, but based on the past experiences, Nigerians are beginning to loss hope in the credibility of Jega’s INEC regime. While some people look at the current situation as a deliberate way to confused Nigerians and allow manipulation to set in, others expressed faith in the Jega led INEC regime. From the time being, it appears the postponement will definitely affect turn-up of voters on Monday.
Another thing is that, in Kaduna North Local Government Area, the final list that include the names of all NYSC (Corps) members as well as INEC ad-hoc staff who were to participate in the election could not be placed until around 7:30pm on Friday. In this way, it was difficult for those involved to travel to various destinations (polling units) on time as many did not even know the exact locations of the polling stations they were assigned to go to. This was also viewed as a deliberate hitch to frustrate the smoothness of the election. Where the issue gets complicated is that, despite all these elections were held in some places that voters’ materials arrived in good time. For example, voting took place in some polling stations in Kagoro in Kaura Local Government Area of Kaduna state. The question now is, would INEC allow the results of such elections to be valid or the people have to recast their vote for the second time?
In whichever way one chooses to view this issue, two things are involved. First, it appears that the billions of naira invested in INEC for the purpose of these 2011 elections is showing no significant positive result. Secondly, if Nigeria has billions of naira to invest in elections that will come and go, instead of fixing the roads to reduce accidents, then the government should be prepared to compensate citizens for the inconveniences caused by INEC in such unwholesome postponement of subsequent elections.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)